The Carmine Caruso Legacy

I think that the concept of a saxophonist and former violinist becoming one of the most well-respected and well-known trumpet (and brass) teachers is a fascinating one. His callisthenic approach will be well-known to many readers through his publications, but in addition to this concentration on the physical synchronisation of different muscle groups, he also built a reputation on positivity and for really nurturing his students.

So many top players over the years attribute a huge portion of their success to Carmine Caruso – I was fortunate enough to be able to gather the thoughts of four of these fabulous players, in order to get to the bottom of how their experiences with Carmine influenced them and their careers: Marvin Stamm, John Thirkell, Randy Brecker and Markus Stockhausen.

VISIT THE ‘EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES’ PAGE FOR FREE WORKSHEETS AND LINKS TO PUBLICATIONS

Why did you go to study with Carmine Caruso?

MARVIN STAMM:  I had just settled in New York City in late 1966 and was beginning to be a part of the jazz and studio scene. I mentioned to friend and fellow trumpet player Burt Collins that I wanted to continue to study and work on certain aspects of my playing. Coming off the road, I was bothered by a few things that I felt needed to be addressed. Burt told me about his study with Carmine, that he was a trouble-shooter and problem-solver. He also mentioned a number of players who had been helped through studying with Carmine, among them the great lead player Al Porcino and others, and he felt Carmine would be the teacher to see.

JOHN THIRKELL:  I was at Leeds College of Music when I first came across the Caruso Method. I had studied several other method books – Claude Gordon, Louis Maggio etc. – but something about the concise and prescriptive nature of the Caruso appealed to my sensibilities. Do A and B will happen, then do C and D will result, and so on. That kind of regime somehow clicked with me and I quickly became a devotee. My then trumpet teacher was, I’m afraid, very much against such perceived radical methods but I think that only made me more determined. I’ve always been (and still am) one for swimming against the tide.

RANDY BRECKER:  I was playing in the Duke Pearson big band in ’66 and the other 3 trumpet players, (Marvin Stamm, Burt Collins and Joe Shepley) had studied with him and swore by him and said I should see him to improve my range.

MARKUS STOCKHAUSEN:  In January 1978 I came to New York. It was a winter with heavy snow. New York was peaceful and quiet. I contacted Marvin Stamm, whom I admired from his recordings with the Pat Williams Orchestra. I told him that I would like to have lessons with him. He denied and said that instead I should go to his teacher, Carmine Caruso, which then I did. Nevertheless, I had a good time with Marvin, he took me several times to studio sessions and gave me the opportunity to feel the scene, to meet other players like Alan Rubin, Lew Soloff, and also, I witnessed a rehearsal with the Maynard Ferguson Band in some hotel, a great experience at the time.

What were your impressions of the first lesson?

MARVIN:  Carmine was one of the most positive thinkers I have ever met, and he strived to infuse this positive attitude into all his students. Any progress, any improvement, no matter how small, was recognized as progress and needed to be appreciated in that light. My impression after my first lesson was that I had really found the teacher who could help me over whatever obstacles I felt were a problem.

JOHN:  My overriding memory of the first lesson was how energizing it was. He had the uncanny ability to make you feel like you could achieve absolutely anything, and he removed much of the worry I had associated with playing and practicing. He always said that, if you are following his instructions implicitly and not making progress, then the fault was in his teaching rather than in you. That idea was incredibly liberating and allowed me to focus on the process rather than worry about any innate ability. Just do it! I felt that sense of positive energy every single time I came out of a lesson.

Also, I couldn’t believe how little I actually played. I would say in the 90 minutes I was with him, I played probably no more than 15 minutes maximum, the rest of the time being taken up with the explanation of his theories and the idea of allowing your body to adapt and find the solutions rather than you consciously trying to find them. That was a common thread in all of the lessons and I would go as far as to say that he was as much a psychologist as he was a trumpet teacher. He talked you into playing well. There is a common idea that, as a trumpet player if you think you are going to miss it, you’ll miss it. Caruso, as with so many other things, turned that into a positive by inculcating the idea that, by knowing that you will hit it, you’ll hit it. And the more you know it, the more you’ll hit it.

RANDY:  Well he had those airline noise-reducing huge headphones on the whole time and talked a lot… and said a bunch of surprising things about how to approach his exercises (don’t worry about your sound, don’t worry if you miss a note etc.

MARKUS:  With Carmine I had seven lessons. Each time he would write me the next exercise on a little sheet of paper. So, in the beginning I just had the six notes I think, and at the end of the month the full system. His book was in preparation and had not yet been released, and he did not care so much about it, I had the expression. His teaching, though he had a system, seemed very individual.

His room was dusty, with old book shelves full of music, and a fan. The heating was hot, he just wore an undershirt, and often put on his headphones while I played, the kind they use in airports. Now I can understand him very well, because also for me the trumpet often is loud to my ears, and I use some plugs or phones when I play or teach a lot. He was very kind with me, like a father. His eyes were loving and distant at the same time. He was very patient, but clear, to the point.

What were the big changes that you found from the way that you had previously approached the trumpet?

MARVIN:  I’m not sure there were big changes in my approach to the trumpet. What I was looking to find were solutions to a problem, and I believe any big changes were more in my thinking—that is, in discovering how and what to practice to overcome these issues.

Problem-solving, of course, is most always a slow process. The time during which I studied with Carmine took place before cell phones, tablets and laptops, even the Internet, so everything moved at a slower pace than it would today. Musicians’ expectations of progress were based on the “long view” rather than how much could be learned in the short term. Carmine had a unique ability to recognize and analyse individual problems, so the exercises he gave were designed for each student to assimilate corrections into their playing slowly, without disrupting their ability to continue working while at the same time finding answers to their musical problems. The exercises were also meant to become permanent solutions that would serve the players throughout their performance career. So, the big changes happened over time and in small increments.

I approached Carmine to help overcome the “break” I had at the top of the staff—to close the space in that area so as to provide a smooth path from top to bottom. Meantime, Carmine also saw problem areas that he could fix while helping me with what I perceived to be my only impediment. I was using movement or manipulation with my hands for one thing; another was playing a note before properly setting for it, kind of like “jumping on a running horse.” Carmine also knew that I wanted to build stamina and broaden my sound, thereby making my lead-playing stronger and more effective. All this we achieved over time. Patience was the key to the results I desired.

JOHN:  The idea that, whilst practicing the Caruso method, you should not worry at all about musicality or the sound. This was purely calisthenics. Building muscle. Pushing the body a tiny bit further every time and allowing it to find a way to cope. Rather than make arbitrary changes in order to achieve an objective, by pushing the body it will find its own way to cope with the added demands. Again, this is incredibly liberating and allows you to stop worrying and just focus on the process.

Tapping the foot is also a big part of the method – that and the breath attack on the first note of an exercise – the idea being to train all of the disparate muscles required to play a note to come together at the exact same time. Again, subliminally training the body to automatically synchronise everything.

RANDY:  Better high register and more flexibility.

MARKUS:  His exercises focused my embouchure and gave me strength and endurance and developed my high register.

Could you feel a big difference in your playing immediately after starting studying with Carmine, or was it a slower process to see results?

MARVIN:  Some things were immediate, but the bulk of what I wanted to achieve was a slower process.

JOHN:  I think I pretty much felt a difference straight away, but this was probably more a result of the incredible sense of self belief which he gave you. You came away from a lesson feeling that nothing was impossible and that certainly manifested in the way I played thereafter. That confidence removes much of the doubt that holds back progress and I found myself playing with much more abandon. On a more physiological level though, pretty soon I found my range, not necessarily expanding that much but certainly becoming much more solid and dependable and I think that was as a result of the muscular development.

RANDY:  Pretty fast I must say.

Were there any aspects of the teaching that contradicted what you had been working on previously?

MARVIN:  Yes and no. His approach was quite different. Carmine was very “up front” that he was not working on students’ musical values, but on their physical attributes, striving to solidify a structural approach to playing the instrument. He told his students NOT to put aside playing etudes, solo pieces, practicing Arban’s, Schlossberg, Colin or other methods. He always stressed to me the importance of mixing in his studies with all the others that I had been working on, especially the musical ones.

If there were any contradictory elements to Carmine’s approach, they might be the use of nose-breathing, the long-settings, and the tapping of one’s foot to create the rhythmic movement of moving from tone to tone.

Nose-breathing allows one to have no movement of the corners of the mouth when taking a breath, thereby making possible a long setting, a consistent or constant placement of the horn to the lips. Tapping of the foot to set up the “time” meant that when moving from one tone to another, the only thing one had to be aware of was to consciously move “to the beat,” thus eliminating having to think of the many other elements of playing the instrument—the tongue, air, and muscles. Only moving to “time.”

Carmine’s exercises might be considered by some to be contrary to the usual structural exercises as those utilized by Schlossberg, Arban, St. Jacome, and Charles Colin. The approach was certainly different. And though I did some work out of the Baermann Clarinet Method, this was not really for any technical aspect, but rather to work over the break that I hoped to minimize to the fullest. All the exercises other than the Baermann were Carmine’s. There was also a strong focus on using dynamics in his exercises, both in a typical and atypical manner. These were used to work the embouchure in a more arduous way, making actual performance of demanding music much easier.

JOHN:  The idea of not being concerned with musicality or sound was very different but you soon learn to separate out the Caruso part of your practice from the other, more music focused stuff. He would use the analogy of a footballer (American football, not proper football) working out in the gym with weights. Where were the weights during the football game? But the weight training was of fundamental importance to his performance on the field.

RANDY:  Well I always worked on my sound and sound didn’t matter when doing his callisthenic exercises.

MARKUS:  He knew all the struggles that I was going through at the time. My embouchure had to be dry while playing, at least the top lip, which had been a problem for me during concerts when I sweated a lot, especially with spot lights on me. His pedal tone exercises followed by the chord pedals gave me a wet embouchure, resulting in much better playing possibilities.

Did you continue with his methods exactly as prescribed, or did you need to adapt them to fit in better with your work schedule, etc.?

MARVIN:  No, I didn’t find a need to adapt anything to fit my work schedule. Carmine always stressed to practice his exercises as he prescribed in the lessons, but when performing in my work, approach things as I usually did. He said the effects of his exercises working their way into my playing would happen by osmosis—that it should happen seamlessly. In my experience, I found this to be true.

I tried to use his methods exactly as prescribed. As is the case with any fine teacher, however, if he felt at some juncture that a change in approach might be more beneficial, he would make the necessary change. I studied with Carmine six and one-half years and continue to include a number of his exercises in my daily practice, along with a number from Laurie Frink, Dennis Najoom, and the classic methods mentioned earlier.

JOHN:  For several years I followed his methods to the letter but in time, as I got busier and busier as a pro player, I slowly watered down the routine as it can be physically quite demanding, and it becomes more important that your chops are in shape for your session rather than completing the whole routine. The Caruso done thoroughly means you are pushing your body more and more and, by overdoing it you can leave your chops a little shredded. I remember explaining the lessons as taught by Caruso to Guy Barker and, being Guy, he went mad and practiced it for hours. Well, of course it did more harm than good, and he pretty soon gave it up. The idea is to go through the day’s routine, take a break then move on to your regular practice. These days I tend to stick to the 6 notes exercise as part of my warm up and maybe once a week do the full routine.

RANDY:  Tried just to do what he said to do, fit them into what I was already doing, but I applied his ideas about timing to other things I did like the Adam Routine warm up.

MARKUS:  At times I would overdo the exercises. Especially the soft-loud-soft, as well as the loud-soft-loud exercises were very strenuous to me when I did them on a daily basis. Nevertheless, I continued the exercises for quite some years, not always very regularly, but still. Within time I found my own way, a little more moderate, and surely not applying the full system, I am aware of that. I do the exercises only from time to time now, when I feel I need to focus my embouchure or prepare for a very hard trumpet concerto. Often just by doing the “Six notes”, the body remembers the whole thing immediately and I can play up and down without any further warm ups. The body actually is magic, how it can reproduce results that have been properly programmed. In fact that is the basis for Carmine’s system, as well as of others of course, that the cells have memory.

I would like to thank Marvin, John, Randy and Markus for their contributions here! Please visit their websites to find out more:

Marvin Stammmarvinstamm.com

John Thirkelljohnnythirkell.com

Randy Breckerrandybrecker.com

Markus Stockhausenmarkusstockhausen.de

Click here to purchase a copy of Carmine Caruso’s ‘Musical Calisthenics for Brass’ at Thompson Music

Markus Stockhausen’s “The Basic Caruso”, from which his quotes are taken above, is available here

Photo Credits: Bev Nathan (John Thirkell), Judy Kirtley ( Marvin Stamm), Gerhard Richter (Markus Stockhausen)


Sign up here for new blog articles emailed direct to your inbox:


Home Recording for Trumpeters

Over the past few months, many of the articles that I have worked on and industry pros that I have interviewed, emphasise how working life has changed drastically since the start of 2020 lockdown. With that in mind, it would be great to explore how we can successfully manage our recordings remotely now that we are all having to work with a greater degree of isolation.

And who better to speak with than 2 industry powerhouses?!

Johnny Thirkell (longtime friend of this website!) has performed on trumpet on over 6000 recordings, including over 40 top ten albums and 23 UK Number One records. Tina Turner, Jamiroquai, David Bowie, George Michael, Bruno Mars, Pet Shop Boys, Level 42 … the list is endless!

Grammy Winner Josh Blair is the ultimate ‘Producer and Engineer to the Stars’ with credits including Adele, Lady Gaga, Jamiroquai, Bruno Mars, Mark Ronson, Duran Duran and Take That.


Johnny Thirkell

I understand that, in these locked-down, Covid times you’ve managed to shift your studio recording career to your home. How does that work?!

Actually, it’s really quite straightforward. The Producer will email or send a link to a rough stereo mix of the track which I just import into Logic and, within 5 minutes I’m overdubbing trumpets. It’s so much easier and more convenient than schlepping into town and enduring the bun fight that is the London Underground and I can record more or less at my convenience. So long as I get it back before the deadline, I do it when it suits me. 

Isn’t that expensive and complicated to set up?

I guess that depends on how far you want to take it. For me it’s really quite basic. All I’m ever going to do is record trumpets over a track, so my equipment needs are pretty minimal. When I send back the recorded trumpets the Producer wants them totally flat – no reverb, no EQ, nothing. So, I don’t need any outboard gear like reverb units or equalisers. Which is just as well because I would have no idea how to use them! My entire rig consists of my MacBook Pro, Logic, a digital interface (I use the Apogee One) and my trusty Royer 121 microphone – for me the truest sounding mic for the trumpet I’ve ever used. Bar none.

In terms of expense, I think it’s always best to get the best you can – particularly the mic. You can be the greatest player in the world, if you’re playing into an awful mic, it’s not going to do you justice. If you’re short of cash, skimp on anything but the mic. The Royer is about £1500 but, trust me, it’s worth every penny if you’re serious about it. From a room perspective, I don’t really have a massive amount of soundproofing but then again I live in the countryside so the occasional squawking Red Kite is about the worst of my problems. If you live in a more urban area then I guess you’re going to have to think about good soundproofing. Bear in mind though, that the inherent volume of the trumpet means that your mic level will be relatively low anyway so it may not pick up faint extraneous sounds. Main thing is though to make sure the room has little or no natural reverb. Keep it as dead as possible because once any natural reverb gets recorded, it can’t be taken off.

And how about technical knowledge? What if you’re something of a technophobe?

Believe me, if I can do it, anyone can. I run the recording procedure very much on a “monkey see, monkey do” basis. I know what I know and that’s about it. If I run into something I don’t understand then there’ll be a YouTube video to help me through it. I’ve learned there are some cardinal rules to apply and, so long as I do that then I rarely run into problems.

And they are?

First of all have a starting template. I have a template in Logic where everything is set up ready to record. There’s a stereo track for the backing track and a bunch of mono tracks ready for the trumpets or flugels. The levels are pretty much set, as is the routing of channels etc. I got someone to help me set it up initially and I’ve hardly ever had to change anything since. Obviously the record levels have to change depending on what it is I’m playing but so long as you make sure that what you record never goes into the red, you’ll be fine. The other thing is sample rate. An engineer will be able to explain the technicalities but basically it seems that some people record at 44.1khz and others at 48khz. Make sure you know which one it is and adjust the setting accordingly in the Audio Settings page. I’ve been caught out by that one. Earlier this year I recorded 10 tracks of trumpets on the BTS single ‘Dynamite’ only to realise that I had the wrong sample rate set and had to do them all again!

VISIT THE ‘EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES’ PAGE FOR FREE WORKSHEETS AND LINKS TO PUBLICATIONS

How does the recording process differ from when you are at a pro studio?

Well, the most obvious difference is that, as well as playing the trumpet, I’m also the engineer. It can get a little awkward having to press record and then play – especially if you have a tight drop-in – but you develop the knack pretty quickly. In terms of mic technique, I would say this would be dependent to a certain degree on what mic you are using. Something like the Royer will take a lot of air pressure so you can get quite close to it but it’s one of those things where a little experimentation will produce great results. Record different things at different volumes and different distances and make a note of the resulting sound. That way you will build up a library of options to wheel out depending on what it is you are recording. Other than that, it’s much the same. 

And then, how do you get the finished results back to the Producer?

There are a couple of things you can do to make the process nice and smooth. Firstly, make sure you have the tempo set correctly before you start and that the backing track starts at Bar 1, Beat 1. Then, when you are finished, put a piece of blank audio on each trumpet track which also starts at beat 1. Then you can merge all of the various sections of each trumpet track into one file so that, when the Producer gets them, he imports them to bar 1 beat 1 and everything will line up. Simple (??!!??). Although the backing track may have been sent to you as an mp3 (quality doesn’t matter for that as it’s only a guide for the trumpet) you should send back the files as WAV or similar high quality.

So, what would you say were the pros and cons of recording at home rather than at a commercial studio?

Well, I would say that flexibility is by far the biggest advantage. Being able to work around your own schedule is very liberating. You can basically go anywhere in the world and your whole recording setup can go with you in a small rucksack. I’m currently riding out the pandemic in Granada and working on some tracks for Jason Derulo – something which I would have had to pass on in the old days. The downside of course is the lack of interaction. Part of being a muso is the social element and you do miss mucking around with your pals in the studio. I don’t miss the Tube, though!


Joshua Blair

How has your working life changed in 2020? Are you doing a lot more work remotely with musicians? How have you found this as a process?

Session (ensemble) sizes have been a lot smaller due to covid restrictions and I’ve been doing a lot more remote work and archive mixing for one of my clients. It can be a bit tricky to get the same sound out of a smaller section but It’s been a nice challenge.

What are the most common requests that you make of trumpet players when you are in the studio with them?

I normally don’t try to make requests of them or any musician for that fact. I’ve been very lucky to work with some amazing musicians over my time and my philosophy is for the technology to get out of the way so they can concentrate on the music not me fussing about them or asking endless questions.

In your view, what is the essential home studio setup that a trumpet player should have in order to record and send you adequate quality audio. And what format should this audio be in?

Decent mic, decent headphones, decent preamp. There’s a lot of great gear out there today and quality equipment prices aren’t too prohibitive. I always like files as BWavs. Sample rate/bit depth should be a question you ask the producer or engineer.

Best mics for recording trumpet?

I’ve always liked condenser mics on trumpets. Some people like ribbons. They’re cool too but on a budget I feel its easier to get a better quality Condenser than Ribbon for the same money. My philosophy is simple, If it sounds good on a voice it’ll sound good on most instruments. You just have to be careful of the SPL as brass can be quite loud. So choose a mic accordingly. Neumann, DPA, Royer are all great brands.

For someone just using a click or guide track in their DAW and recording a limited number of tracks of audio, have you any top tips for improving workflow etc?

A few simple things…

1. Don’t record too hot to the DAW.. Once it distorts its very hard to ‘fix’.

2. Learn how to do some basic editing so you can sort out the parts you’re sending and only send the ones you need with some nice x-fades between the edits.

3. Once you have all your parts, bounce the tracks out all from the same starting point along with the guide track so whom ever is receiving the parts knows where things go.

4. Don’t add any reverb to your tracks (unless requested). If you like some FX you’ve used print them on separate tracks so the Raw (un-processed) tracks are available. I tend to record 5-6 sets of OH mics on drums for one of my clients… Not because we’d use all of them at the same time but as the production changes over time we wouldn’t have to re-record the drums we could just use the different mics to get a different flavour that suited the new direction.

VISIT THE ‘EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES’ PAGE FOR FREE WORKSHEETS AND LINKS TO PUBLICATIONS

What are the most common mistakes that people make when recording and sending you stuff?

Number one is distortion. Number two is the mic’s too far away or there’s too much “room” on the mic. Tuning and timing I can fix.

Do you think that remote recording is going to play a larger role as we hopefully move out of this pandemic?

Yes and no. There’s nothing like the sound of a group of people energising the air in a room together. However, now everyone knows how simple it is to be remote we might see more of that kind of work.

Any other general advice?

Always try to find the joy in what you do!


To find out more about Josh Blair, please visit his website: http://www.joshuablair.com

To read more about Johnny Thirkell you can click here: https://www.johnnythirkell.com

You may also be interested to read some of the other articles that Johnny has contributed to:

Trumpet Artist Profile : John Thirkell

The Carmine Caruso Legacy

Horn Camp 2020


Sign up here for new blog articles emailed direct to your inbox:


Finding the perfect orchestral mouthpiece

I have spent a lot of time recently (mainly virtually!) working with players who have used this enforced period of time off to look at new and possibly better mouthpiece options for themselves. Many classical, and particularly specialist orchestral players are traditionally very conservative in their choices and often choose to stick to the ‘tried and tested’, even if it is not necessarily completely trusted. Often the rigours and pressures of full-time orchestral playing do not allow time for experimentation!

I have given a summary below of eight Frate Precision models that have worked really well for players looking for a rich and open core sound with great orchestral projection. Each of these eight mouthpieces however have their own unique characteristics:

VISIT THE ‘EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES’ PAGE FOR FREE WORKSHEETS AND LINKS TO PUBLICATIONS


1 M, 3, 102

Cup diameter 16.95mm, Medium deep cup, Throat 3.74mm, Medium-large Backbore #102 : Equivalent: 1-1/2C (26 throat)

This is the new ‘Easy Selection’ model with the #1 rim, and a best seller! The #1 models all have a really comfortable rim and the M (medium deep) cups seem to suit most players that I have encountered. The slightly open throat and the flexible backbore give a nice balance between core sound and flexibility. Great on both Bb and C trumpets.


1 M

Cup diameter 16.95mm, Medium deep cup, Throat 3.66mm, Medium-large backbore #101 : Equivalent: 1-1/2C

This has a similar responsive feeling to the model above, but with a slightly tighter throat and brighter backbore. Particularly good on C trumpets as well as larger Eb instruments such as the Schilke E4. This has also been a really good mouthpiece to recommend to students who have perhaps just moved up to their first ‘larger’ mouthpiece.


1 M, 3, 106

Cup diameter 16.95mm, Medium deep cup, Throat 3.74mm, Medium-large backbore #106 : Equivalent: 1-1/2 C (26-24)

This is my personal favourite, and the model that has really got peoples’ attention here in the UK. It has a nice open feel but with a really rich core sound, great stability and slotting as well as flexibility.


2 M, 3, 102

Cup diameter 16.95mm, Medium deep (V-shape) cup, Throat 3.74mm, Medium-large backbore #102 : Equivalent: 1-1/4C

Although it has the same rim shape, size and contour as the #1 models, the slight V-shape of the cup gives a very different feel and response, more similar to a Bach 1-1/4C. It retains the immense core sound and stability of the 102 backbore, and woks really well across both Bb and C trumpets.


2 M, 3, 106

Cup diameter 16.95mm, Medium deep (V-shape) cup, Throat 3.74mm, Medium-large backbore #106 : Equivalent: 1-1/4C (26-24)

This is a slightly more open feeling and sounding version of the 2 M, 3, 102. The #106 backbore gives that big core sound, but still with the level of control, response and flexibility that players need.


3 M, 3, 106

Cup diameter 16.62mm, Medium deep cup, Throat 3.74mm, Medium-large backbore #106 : Equivalent: 3C (26-24)

For players that like a narrower inside rim, but still an open feel to the mouthpiece. There are a number of well-known makers such as Monette, AR Resonance etc., that use extremely open throats and backbores to get players to fall in love with the sound. However, these infatuations are often short-lived when you realise what you have lost – core sound and flexibility. Both this model and the 1 M, 3, 106 offer the perfect compromise, giving you openness, core sound, response and flexibility.


6+ M, 3, 106

Cup diameter 17.12mm, Medium deep (V-shape) cup, Throat 3.74mm, Medium-large backbore #106 : Equivalent: 1-1/4C – 1C (26-24)

This has a wider inner rim, and a smooth V-shape cup alongside the fantastic power of the #106 backbore. This is a great full-sounding orchestral mouthpiece that has suited players moving from 1, 1C and 1-1/4C style pieces.


5+ M, 3, 106

Cup diameter 17.12mm, Medium deep cup, Throat 3.74mm, Medium-large backbore #106 : Equivalent: 1C (26-24)

The 5+ has the same configuration as the 6+, but with a more traditional bowl-shape medium depth cup. The response is similar, but perhaps with more of a roundness to the sound.


VISIT THE ‘EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES’ PAGE FOR FREE WORKSHEETS AND LINKS TO PUBLICATIONS


Sign up here for new blog articles emailed direct to your inbox:


How to Clean the Trumpet

This article was originally published by Ken Saul of Ultra Pure Oils, it is clear and comprehensive so I have re-published it here! Other brands are of course available to use, but I am yet to find any cleaning and maintenance accessories that are as slick and reliable as Ultra Pure.

Keep your horn clean and you will never have a problem with sticky valves or slides. Keeping it clean inside also removes bacteria that can build up in the tubing.

VISIT THE ‘EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES’ PAGE FOR FREE WORKSHEETS AND LINKS TO PUBLICATIONS

Daily Wipe Down

You should wipe off your trumpet at the end of each day using the Ultra-Pure microfiber polishing cloth. Gently wipe all the surfaces, especially where you hold the horn. Wipe off any water spots. The microfiber cloth will soak up oils and grease and should be washed once a month. If you have a silver plated trumpet, you can use a silver polishing cloth to remove tarnish about once a week. Use it to wipe the outside of the instrument only.

microfiber cloth and trumpet cleaning
Wipe the outside of the horn every day to remove fingerprints, water spots and oils.

Bath Time

You should give your trumpet a bath about every month or two to keep it in the best condition. It only takes about 30 minutes to do a good job.

Carefully pull out the main tuning slide and the three valve slides. Wipe off any grease on slides with a paper towel. Remove the bottom valve caps. If they are stuck, try using a rubber jar opener, not pliers. Also wipe off the bottom valve caps with the paper towel. Then remove the three valves. They are numbered 1, 2, and 3. When you pull out the valves, check which way the number faces, the mouthpiece or bell end. When you put the valves back, they will face the same way.

Put a rubber mat or a towel in a tub or large sink and fill it with lukewarm water. Add some lemon-scented dishwashing liquid detergent (about a tablespoon is enough). Gently immerse the trumpet, the slides, the bottom valve caps, and your mouthpiece. Put some of the soapy water in a glass and immerse the valves, keeping the felts dry. Let everything soak for 10 minutes or more.

soaking a trumpet for cleaning
Take the trumpet apart and soak it in lukewarm (not hot) soapy water.
Trumpet valves soaking in a glass of soapy water
Soak the valves in soapy water while keeping the felts dry.

Run the snake through the leadpipe and all the trumpet body tubing several times. Run it down the bell and around the back bend. Use the snake to clean the insides of the tuning slide and the valve slides. Don’t force the snake if it does not bend around the tubing easily.

Cleaning a trumpet with a snake brush
Use the flexible snake brush to clean all the inner tubing.

Scrub the valve casings from the top and from the bottom with the valve casing brush. Clean the bottom valve caps carefully to remove all the residues. Finally, clean the mouthpiece with the mouthpiece brush. Drain the tub or sink and rinse all the parts completely. Let them dry on a towel.

scrubbing a trumpet valve casing
Scrub the valve casings with the cylindrical brush.
Cleaning a trumpet mouthpiece
Scrub the mouthpiece with the tapered brush.

Clean the valves

Gently clean the valve ports with soapy water using the snake brush or the valve casing brush. Scrub the valve surface with soapy water using the valve casing brush or an old toothbrush. Be careful not to scratch the valve surface. Wash the valves with plenty of clean water and let them dry on a towel.

Lubricate the slides

Put a small amount of Ultra-Pure Regular Tuning Slide Lube on your finger and rub it onto the slide. Insert the slide all the way and wipe off any excess lube with a paper towel. If you are used to moving the first and third valve slides quickly for more accurate tuning, you should use Ultra-Pure Light Tuning Slide Lube on these slides. Also, rub a little slide lube on the top and bottom valve casing threads. Slides should be lubed about once a week or two.

Grease a trumpet tuning slide
Rub a small amount of tuning slide grease on each slide and put it back into the horn. Wipe off any excess grease with a paper towel.

Oil the valves

Hold the valve over a sink, cloth or newspaper and coat it with plenty of Ultra-Pure Professional Valve Oil.  Carefully put it back into the casing and make sure the valve “clicks” into place, facing the right direction. When putting the valve back in its casing, do not rotate it since this can cause excessive wear. Screw the bottom valve caps back on. After the valves are in, try blowing some air into the leadpipe while moving the pistons. If air stops, you probably have one or more valves in backward.

Valve oil and a trumpet valve
Drip plenty of valve oil onto the valve surface to lubricate it.

Reapply valve oil every day or two

You should oil your valves every day or two. Just unscrew the valve and pull it up and out of the casing. Coat the valve with oil and carefully put it back in the casing. 

Treat your instrument gently

Be gentle with your instrument. It is dented easily and dents make the instrument harder to play or can cause valves or slides to stick. Keep the horn in your hands, on your lap, or in the case. Not on the bed, a chair, or on the floor. If the instrument gets a dent, or if your mouthpiece gets stuck, take it to a music store to be repaired professionally.

VISIT THE ‘EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES’ PAGE FOR FREE WORKSHEETS AND LINKS TO PUBLICATIONS

You may also be interested to read this article about ‘Bagpipe Lung’ to emphasise the importance of keeping your trumpet clean!


Sign up here for new blog articles emailed direct to your inbox:


Claude Gordon Practice Routines

The following article was originally written by Jeff Purtle and published in The Brass herald in 2009. Jeff Purtle is a private teacher, clinician, and trumpet player with international clientele. As a protégé of Claude Gordon he continues the traditions of Claude Gordon and Herbert L. Clarke with effortless playing and productive practice. Please visit purtle.com for a fabulous range of educational content.


A practice routine is a tool to become an excellent and consistent player. It also gives a scientific way to understand how to improve specific skills. These qualities are essential for a long successful career. Claude Gordon believed anyone could be a “virtuoso” if he knew how to practice.

Gordon took Herbert L. Clarke’s principles and applied them with more structure. My previous article defined the content and this article is about the practical application. The assignments serve to set goals and understand what causes the progress. Refer to the pictured assignment from Gordon and the explanation below. Even Gordon improved his teaching over the years by using this method.

Claude Gordon Practice Routine - Jeff Purtle - Jan 28, 1985

VISIT THE ‘EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES’ PAGE FOR FREE WORKSHEETS AND LINKS TO PUBLICATIONS

Breathing Exercises

Breathing Exercises are always the first item. The focus is on taking a “Big Breath” and maintaining the chest in an “up” position during both inhale and exhale. Forget about the stomach or diaphragm. If the chest stays up you cannot breath incorrectly. The first exercise is 5 sets of 10 breaths standing in place. The second exercise is called “5 Walking,” which is 5 equal sniffs-inhaling while walking, 5 holding-full, 5 puffs-exhaling, and 5 holding-empty, then repeating this cycle walking a square city block. Each month it progresses one more step, then after 10 walking it moves to 5 jogging until finally reaching 10 jogging. Another form of breathing exercise is the “long hold” in the “Range Study” section.

Order

Sections A through D of the CG assignment were usually flexibility studies, intervals, tonguing and scales. Tongue Level studies should usually be the first thing to play. Gordon said, “The air does the work; the tongue channels the pitch.” They develop flexibility and ease in navigating the instrument. It is similar to stretching before a physical sport to be flexible. Gordon’s Daily Trumpet Routines book is excellent to use with all the models. Other flexibility books like ColinIronsWalter Smith and Staigers may be used in this area too. The point is to “watch the tongue” and learn how to coordinate the wind power and tongue level to discover how to “let the air do the work”, as Gordon said, and not be focused on the lip. Collect all possible material in this category even from other instruments as Gordon did.

Section I of the CG assignment is where the fingers and breath control are developed while working on Clarke’s Technical Studies. The first priority is to “strike the valves hard and lift the fingers high”, which is mandatory. Do each study with seven days of each of the following: single tongued, K tongued, double (or triple) tongued, and finally slurring as written. Practice accurately to play accurately. Things should then be prioritized as follows: accuracy, evenness, speed, whisper soft playing and finally repetitions in one breath. Never play softer than you can get a secure sound. Other scales and arpeggio studies fit in this area too, but Clarke’s book should be reviewed at least annually. Refer to Gordon’s Systematic Approach book for the some of the fingerings from Clarke that were passed down to Gordon. These are mandatory to train the fingers to function independently of each other with speed and control.

How You Practice

“How You Practice” was Gordon’s label for a way of practicing technical etudes and problem passages. It involves starting on the last beat of the music and progressively working backward one beat at a time with four perfect performances in a row before moving to the next step. (Use diagram with steps.)

How You Practice Diagram

Range Study

Down Routine

Claude Gordon - Systematic Approach - Down Routine

Section II of the CG assignment is the Range Study area. This takes the player first into the pedal tones (i.e. “Down Routine”), followed by a 5-10 minute rest, then to the high register (i.e. “Up Routine”), followed by a brief warm down (i.e. “Relax Lip”) and an hour long rest.  All the other routine elements work along with the Range Study to increase the player’s range. The goal is a more playable range, usable in all situations. 

Up Routine

Claude Gordon - Systematic Approach - Up Routine

The “long hold” in the Down Routine is held until the sound stops and all the air is expelled. This is an isometric type of exercise that strengthens the muscles used for blowing. You never do a hold like that on high notes. The Down Routine played before the Up Routine helps the player discover how to play high with ease as opposed to tightness. Playing from pedals to the high register can be effortless if worked on systematically. The rests are not literally four beats, but you must rest as much as you play with the mouthpiece off the lips to avoid fatigue and bad habits that come from playing when tired. Gordon said, “If you rest properly you can play all day.” This also develops endurance by learning the knack of playing with ease instead of by brute force. “Watch the tongue” meant to visualize the tongue and feel it’s unique vowel position for every note. This is how you learn to play accurately. The “Eee” syllable must be in the very front of the tongue for faster air speed. Gordon said, “Let the air do the work and let the air save the lip.” This means to blow stronger when ascending to get the right feel. Pedal F through C# should be played in tune. Pedal C through Pedal F# are initially very flat for most people, but the pitch will come up in time. It is possible to play to the third pedal C or lower. The pedals help improve a free vibration of the lips and indirectly help many aspects of playing. Care must be taken to not play them too loud.

Start the Up Routine in the pedals. On the first arpeggio leave pedal C below pitch, but play pedal E in tune by sounding the note 8va to get a reference pitch before playing the arpeggio. This fermata should only be a brief hold with a crescendo. Rest between each key. Continue up as far as possible. Remember this is a calisthenic exercise more than a musical exercise. Work up as high as possible, making only make three attempts at the highest note and then stopping to avoid developing bad habits.

Relax Lip

Relax Lip Warm Down to Pedal C and Lower

“Relax Lip” was a brief warm down to be played 3x after the Range Study. It can also be played other times. After the Range Study and “Relax Lip” the player shouldn’t play a note for an hour in order to completely recover. It is also wise to not do the Range Study before a demanding performance.

Technique Applied

Section III of the CG assignment is where solos, etudes, orchestral excerpts and other music is placed. The Range Study can also be placed at the very end of the routine with the etudes before it.

There are other variations that can be made to the routine, but this is the normal way. See the article What To Practice on www.purtle.com for a list of books to use in the routines. The practice routines are how the player can learn that brass playing is no harder than deep breathing. It’s not luck or natural talent. After playing the routine you should feel better than when you started. The goal of the routine is to learn to play with ease.

There is a balance between staying too long on an exercise and loosing focus vs. not staying long enough for the exercise to accomplish the desired result. Sometimes the same items can be worked on with variations. A teacher can spot things we ourselves don’t notice.

Personal Use

Claude Gordon Certified Teacher Certificate

In order to teach correctly you have to play correctly and understand it. Gordon said the following on my pedagogy certificate from 1989, “…with personal use of these principles is hereby qualified to teach correctly.” Gordon knew that the teacher must be in tune with his own playing and practice in order to take students along the road to improvement.